Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

Writing the near history, the difficulties

Gezi Events was a manifestation of a pax convention between various circles.

Everyone knows and accepts it is either the secret world or the public life, circles differ in purpose of competing or even battling with each other.

The only solid remnant of the Gezi events seem to be the de facto adoption of the circles into the daily politics and its affiliations.

Its slogans, feelings, capabilities and incapabilities points out, as being the most enduring one at least, the circles as the true achievement of Gezi events to the social order.

Whereas the current government have given the primary contribution to the forming of such a public while taken its part as maintaining the dominant circle, or transforming its supporters into a political circle or a regime police in other words.

Circle consciousness has risen and taken the part of class consciousness, various causes under its own  analytical comprehension: while even decomposing, destructuring their true nature.

Circles are the new comintern, the party, whereas its dirigeants are very vague and weak seeing as the current situation of the electoral democracy.

Any change of government, regime, party means change of borders, limits, orders etc.

Logic of democracy is captive, while the evolution follows an evolution of war, a battle ground.

Sunday, 25 March 2018

Turkey's youth

Gezi Events was an enormous manifestation in Istanbul at the end of a decade of AKP rule in Turkey. 

Youth was always a controversial subject in Turkey such as golden youngsters or kind of praises were manifested in the press. But the youth as a public figure was always limited to that of talents or some other exceptional stories. And not as a political figure except the ones that are popular since the formation of the republic. Yet till the 1980s university students were more associated with anarchism etc. and this stigmatization even continued more than years.

Gezi Events as a political defence was actually symbolically intersecting with the way of living of this youth as in good weather youth usually go to some green areas of the city and spend time there, and it was a choice of public life became quite popular among this generation especially with the increase of music concerts at open-air areas in Turkey.

There were other demonstrations for urban causes such as demolition of historical buildings but in these ones the demonstrators for its age group or generation were much different like those who had memories in the public life with those urban subjects.

Yet such an enormous amount of people or youth came together without a demand for a change in regime but solely criticizing a political party and its rule in various fields of the state.

Much also has to be researched for the integration of such a young generation in means of economy and social life wether Turkey is prepared and apparently not.

Yet this generation will also be in conflict with CHP or other so-told democratic parties. And this is a very serious issue.


As CHP is quite happy for its own situation while having a rival party providing many resources of political faults in order to enforce its position of being the sole opposition, yet no responsibility is on their shoulders for the changing Turkey and changing youth. CHP is causing a civil war within Turkey between political views. A conservative party in power is the best way of oppression and forcefully shaping this young generation to remain within the controversial oppositional political view of the CHP.

Saturday, 23 September 2017

Modern (Cyber) Slavery: Data Protection and its derivative employments

New terms and concepts are in need to better describe and depict consequences of the violation of the Rule of Law. As George Vedel had also took the attention:

"Furthermore, totalitarianism does not consist only in the concentration of all political power (directly or indirectly) in the same hands (man or party), but also in the fact that the political authorities claim to control all aspects of the individual's life: his upbringing, his intellectual training, his beliefs, his work, his leisure, his private life, etc. 

The struggle against totalitarianism therefore implies another series of "separations": separation of State and private life; separation of State and religion or beliefs in the broadest sense; separation of State and work."

Along with "political authorities" comes new notions to be anticipated within the law, legislation consequently of the cyber issues brought to the contemporary age which also requires not only textual laws but concepts to be comprehended by the judiciaries.

  • post-cyberage feudalsim
  • feudal totalitarianism / terrorism
  • diverse totalitarianism / terrorism
  • illegal / unpermitted offences through illegal accession of datas totalitarianism / terrorism

" In his 2007 book on Jim Jarmusch, author Juan Antonio Suarez remarks that the director’s films “are centrally concerned with situatio...