Syria between the war and the settlement

I don't believe if Assad leaves the problems in Syria would be solved, but is he really a leader in democratic means which has to be the concern if there is any plan for governance in the future both for himself but also -last not the least- for the Syria as well:

I'm sure Syria has excellent bureaucrats and giving him assistance for governance and at least and urgently should be known "the future and appropriate integrity of the Sunni subjects in Syria under his governance as a policy."

Otherwise it is one way or the other "assumed as an intention to suppress / disregard to the rights of subjects" which would as well taken for validing furious reactions. 

Such committed enjoyment of the Syria's Assad to the democratic formation of his country will serve as well to the conventions, treaties and agreements aiming to resolve the problems in Syria in a positive mean to help the secure and peaceful development of the diplomatic achievements.

What kind of a subject (other than roles in armed conflicts) the Kurds are envisioning to be in Syria is still a question not responded yet lack of ability to establish diplomatic means is one of the de-escalatory obstacle for the Syrian settlement causing Turkish worry at a critical level.

*

War is a quite difficult "phenomenon" for many disciplines to comprehend by their solely own instruments of comprehension. Politics and international relations or economy are not exceptions.

War is a phenomenon above politics and international affairs. For me, it is the contrary of the History, although there is much historical research on wars. Which is a good thing.

*

Turkish Armed Forces wants to prepare its perception among public in Turkey. Is there any political concern for it is in doubt, it is maybe the institutional strength however seems like the AKP also has such concerns, identifying their political strength with state security, which is not a new issue already. 

Perception of the institutions is an important concern in Turkish politics regardless of which one. There are even "wars" targeting the "perceptions" among the institutions or political parties in Turkey. And it is, broadly, an equivalent of the public suffrage as the poll companies are the most respected guests of the political debates in the Turkish media.

But it is also a violation to the separation of powers. 

*

I myself put quite a lot effort while researching on how can a democratic political regime can be reestablished in Turkey. Democratic order of the state institutions is vulnerable to those who are ambitious to those of whom have no concern to protect and respect the democratic nature of them.

Wether if they are successfully democratic institutions is a debate held within the quest for a new constitution in Turkey for years, which AKP have failed and we are observing the reasons now: democratic process is a long term issue but it is not acceptable as such violations are that often, as such unending greed is the motivation behind policies we see as a citizen that often.

*

Turkish military operation in Afrin is only reasonable for the government of Syria have not introduced a democratic process for their country. 

How can it be in a war-torn country, is an important question, but the problem is a quest for a peaceful dependency of the border faculty.