Leftist politics and democracy: Artificial intelligence problems

Artificial Intelligence is a debate, it is a scientific debate belonging to the computer science. Application programming (production) for computers shaped by demands, needs of people (if we are to write a history of computer programmers, or computer based applications), broadly as a complementary instrument for the human intelligence eg. leaving the focus on the creativity for an efficiency while leaving other requisites for production to be handled by the computer with the help of applications.

Debate on the Artificial Intelligence is wether programming can achieve to a "level" of producing applications to be computed without the need of a human. In an example, AutoCAD one of the most detailed, difficult applications used by the architects to have architectural projects without an educated architect it has no use and contribution for architecture.

Karl Marx has benefited from Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill who were liberal economy philosophers for his writings: to shed a light for the working class where a governing body was not existing for them, liberal economy was shaped by the, say, intelligence of a modern person but someone from the working-class was left aside especially because of the dilemma it brings to the modernist society.

Although Karl Marx is not an ideologue: he also has ideological writings, which are also discussed and developed then as well. Where I want to come is artificial intelligence is actually not really a new subject of discussion: ideologies were obtainable logically artificial intelligence applications to shape or form political attitudes, in the Karl Marx's case, it was for the purpose of helping the working-class to act in co-operation to realize the evolution of the history in Europe primarily by achieving the granting of the rights of the working-class.

Massive co-operation within assumed presumptions (political attitudes) to imply a regulative power on governance was one of the faces for the formation of democracy in the 19th century Europe.

Although Turkey can't be compared to the Europe while the evaluation of history: formation of democracy in the 19th and 20th and 21st century has to be compared.

The difference of Turkey lost in time and space, to Europe can easily be figured out while reading the publications of the Council of Europe and the Commission for the Democracy through Law in means of governance.